[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: Announcement from Technical Architecture
Message text written by INTERNET:email@example.com >Deriving an XML syntax from a UML model in a consistent manner means you *don't* repeat the modeling process; rather, you use the superior modeling medium to model the domain and then generate the XML syntax according to a well-defined pattern. David S. Frankel< >>>>>>>>>>>> Once upon a time we talked about reversable process. I'd still like to be able to do that - i.e. import my DTD (aka schema) into a UML tool and have it then make those components available. Then I can do interesting UML things on top to enhance the documentation. I've used Visio Professional like this against SQL tables, and this just seems such a natural win-win. Never under estimate the power of simple! Not everyone wants to start the process in a UML tool - nor should they need too. DW.
Powered by eList eXpress LLC