RE: ebXML: TA doc, sect 10, RegRep, redone as more of an Arch doc

["Petit, John" <jpetit@kpmg.com>]

Sounds very good to me.

-JP

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Suttor [mailto:Jeff.Suttor@eng.sun.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2000 1:46 PM
To: ebxml-architecture@lists.ebxml.org
Subject: ebXML: TA doc, sect 10, RegRep, redone as more of an Arch doc


Feedback from ebXML participants seems to be that the TA doc is not
structured 
like an architectural doc.

I agree with this so I took the TA doc, sect 10, RegReg, and removed all 
requirements, specifications and implementation details.  Now that all 
non-Architecture content has been removed, it needs more fleshing out with
new 
content to be complete.  The document in its current state is attached to
this 
message.

I would like to propose that we incrementally rewrite the TA doc as an 
Architectural doc.  All of the good work that was done on the original doc
that 
is not Architectural in nature, can be reused by other teams.  e.g. some use

cases can be sent to the project teams to be used for their functional
specs, 
etc.

I have resoures that can be committed to this effort.

What does the project team think?

--
Jeff.Suttor@Sun.com      http://sun.com/xml
XML Technology Center    http://web.eng/xml
*****************************************************************************
The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else
is unauthorized. 

If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution
or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited
and may be unlawful. When addressed to our clients any opinions or advice
contained in this email are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in
the governing KPMG client engagement letter.         
*****************************************************************************