Re: ebXML: TA doc, sect 10, RegRep, redone as more of an Arch doc

[duane <duane@xmlglobal.com>]

Jeff:

We need all the help we can get.  My only worry is the judgement of the
QR team.  IF you feel they will approve the work,  please go ahead.

We need to clarify that the other work will freeze until you deliver the
document back to the group so no concurrent work takes place.

Anders -  please withdraw the TA spec from the QR team and we will
resubmit once Jeff finishes his work.

Other ITems:

Colin:  HOw is the GLossary going?

Brian:  DO you have a list of all the comments on version 0.8.71?  If
so,  can you please send a matrix to Jeff and maybe we can also do some
updating as well.

I will check my emails to see if I have some which were not sent to the
list.

I am still in Berlin.  I won't be back home until October 6th-7th and
then I'm leaving again.

I will have access to email.

Duane



Jeff Suttor wrote:
> 
> Feedback from ebXML participants seems to be that the TA doc is not structured
> like an architectural doc.
> 
> I agree with this so I took the TA doc, sect 10, RegReg, and removed all
> requirements, specifications and implementation details.  Now that all
> non-Architecture content has been removed, it needs more fleshing out with new
> content to be complete.  The document in its current state is attached to this
> message.
> 
> I would like to propose that we incrementally rewrite the TA doc as an
> Architectural doc.  All of the good work that was done on the original doc that
> is not Architectural in nature, can be reused by other teams.  e.g. some use
> cases can be sent to the project teams to be used for their functional specs,
> etc.
> 
> I have resoures that can be committed to this effort.
> 
> What does the project team think?
> 
> --
> Jeff.Suttor@Sun.com      http://sun.com/xml
> XML Technology Center    http://web.eng/xml