[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: Parties and Partners
Message text written by Murray Maloney >. But you'll note that, in this case, there is no 'Trading Partner' agreement involved. And a model that does not support the Coke machine business case is not robust.< >>>>>>>>>> Murray, There's at least an implied TPA as the Coke machine has to recognize the signal from the cell phone, and authenticate this somehow (back end server to GSM server interfacing to validate phone SIM ID -or similar). Since the GSM server will not let just anyone (or Coke machine!) talk to it, there is a TPA there somewhere! We are on the right track here using this Coke example - as you note - this is exactly the sort of use case that we need to be able to demonstrate for the architecture. Thanks, DW.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC