Re: TA agenda Tokyo

["agrangard@nycall.com" <anders.grangard@edifrance.org>]

I have noted this as a full day subgroup activity on Tuesday. I take it from
Murray's response that this is OK for the QR team aswell. In my view it is
appropriate if someone from the QR team would chair the session, but if
requested I will. The agenda should be the QR report.

Regards
Anders

----- Original Message -----
From: duane <duane@xmlglobal.com>
To: Murray Maloney <murray@muzmo.com>
Cc: <ebxml-architecture@lists.ebxml.org>; 'ebXML Coordination'
<ebxml-coord@lists.ebxml.org>
Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2000 8:37 PM
Subject: Re: TA agenda Tokyo


> Okay - regardless of what is happening with the spec being out for
> approval to the public || just ebxml members, we still need to plan this
> meeting.  As far as a chair person,  we need an experienced chair.   I
> would recommend a format where we move quickly past the sections of the
> document we don;t have issues with.  There is really not a lot of great
> dissent from the last group of comments from QRT.  One of the most
> important issues we have is to clear up any confusion about our
> perception of contradictory directives (ie - too much/too little
> detail).  Let's take the QRT comments as a general agenda and address
> each one of those sections bit by bit.
>
> I would rather abstain as chair myself as I have too big a
> responsibility already with respect to  updating the architecture
> document as we go along, unless Brian Eisenberg would take over master
> scribe control.
>
> Can you please draft up an issues list from the last group of comments
> Murray.  Let's see if we can get something agreed to before Tokyo as an
> agenda so we can maximize our time.
>
> Duane Nickull
>
>
> Murray Maloney wrote:
> >
> > Duane,
> >
> > I like the direction you are headed.
> >
> > I think we all know that agreement on the ebXML Architecture is crucial.
> > I don't think we will consider that agreement reached unless everyone
who
> > considers themself a stakeholder is encouraged to participate. I
recommend
> > a day-long, open, Architecture meeting -- attendance limited to room
size.
> > We should be equipped with a data projector, the document, and all
comments.
> >
> > The goal of the meeting is to edit and/or record editorial instructions
> > which the participants agree are needed prior to the next round of
reviews
> > and comments. A high degree of success would have the complete set of
> > editorial instructions decided by the end of the day and incorporated by
> > the end of the week. Lesser degrees of success we should not tolerate.
> >
> > The keys to the success of such a meeting are the cooperation of all
> > participants and the effectiveness of the chair in managing the process.
> > Cooperation of participants includes constructive compliance, whereby
> > one agrees to record dissent on a decision to allow the group to move
on.
> > Similarly, members can empower another member to represent their view,
> > thereby reducing the number of active participants.
> >
> > The responsibility of Quality Team members in this scenario includes
> > providing process advice to the chair and all participants; their goal
> > is to keep the meeting moving along and help overcome any obstacles.
> > The Quality Review team is guided by best practice, the ebXML Process
> > and Requirements, and input provided by particpating members of ebXML.
> >
> > This open process ensures that all parties are heard, actions are
> > recorded and vetted, and process is observed to be working smoothly.
> >
> > Anyway, that is what I think, from an ebXML Quality Review perspective.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Murray
> >
> > At 11:32 PM 10/28/00 -0700, duane wrote:
> > >Anders, Murray, Nagwa, Brian et al:
> > >
> > >I would like to propose that on Tuesday we hold a special session with
a
> > >split group from TA and QRT.   We should split the TA team into two
> > >groups - one to work with QRT on addressing their specific comments on
> > >the TA spec and the second team to start categorizing the general
> > >comments we receive from the other teams.
> > >
> > >Murray Maloney from QRT has already agreed to sit with us for a while
> > >and I would also hope that Tim, Nagwa and Jon also attend or have at
> > >least one other QRT member attend with a list of currently outstanding
> > >issues.
> > >
> > >I think that by working together in Tokyo for one full day,  we can
> > >fully address the issues facing the TA spec.
> > >
> > >Comments?
> > >
> > >Duane Nickull
> > >
> > >"agrangard@nycall.com" wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Below you will find my proposed TechArch agenda for the Tokyo
meeting. As
> > >> you will see I have tried to keep it as clean as possible to allow
core work
> > >> to be done. If you want to add or change anything, please do so
before
> > >> Thursday next week.
> > >>
> > >> Have a good trip and see you in Tokyo.
> > >>
> > >> Anders
> > >>
> > >> Draft Agenda
> > >> ebXML Technical Architecture Project Team
> > >> Tokyo, 6 - 10 November 2000
> > >>
> > >> Monday, 6 November
> > >> 09:00 - 10:00 ebXML Technical Orientation
> > >> 10:00 - 11:00 Open Plenary
> > >> 11:00 - 12:00 Opening of the TA meeting, practical details, new
sub-group:
> > >> Security
> > >> 12:00 - 13:00 Lunch
> > >> 13:00 - 17:30 Review received comments
> > >>
> > >> Tuesday, 7 November
> > >> 08:00 - 08:15 Report from yesterdays Steering Committee
> > >> 08:15 - 12:00 Review received comments (subgroups)
> > >> 12:00 - 13:00 Lunch & Learn (Presentation on Conformance)
> > >> 13:00 - 16:00 Review received comments (subgroups)
> > >> 16:00 - 17:30 Review received comments
> > >> 17:30 - 18:00 Wrap-up, input to steering committee
> > >>
> > >> Wednesday, 8 November
> > >> 08:00 - 08:15 Report from yesterdays Steering Committee
> > >> 08:15- 12:00 Review received comments (subgroups), Joint sessions
with other
> > >> PTs, as appropriate
> > >> 12:00 - 13:00 Lunch & Learn
> > >> 16:00 - 17:30 Review received comments
> > >> 17:30 - 18:00 Wrap-up, input to steering committee
> > >>
> > >> Thursday, 9 November
> > >> 08:00 - 08:15 Report from yesterdays Steering Committee
> > >> 08:15 - 12:00 Finalise Tech Arch 1.0 (subgroups), review of Hong Kong
> > >> presentation (Krishna Sankar)
> > >> 12:00 - 13:00 Lunch & Learn
> > >> 13:00 - 16:30 Finalise Tech Arch 1.0
> > >> 16:30 - 17:00 Wrap-up, input to steering committee
> > >>
> > >> Friday, 10 November
> > >> 08:00 - 12:00 Prepare closing plenary presentation and future work
> > >> 12:00 - 13:00 Lunch
> > >> 13:00 - 15:00 ebXML Closing Plenary
> > >