RE: Final Review Instructions

["Welsh, David" <David.Welsh@nordstrom.com>]

Title: RE: Final Review Instructions

FYI

BP Analysis group wants UMM as the reference model for BP analysis, and a list of  UMM edits for TMWG has been drawn up which Karsten is helping sort out.

 

Dave

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Brian Eisenberg [mailto:BrianE@DataChannel.com]
Sent: Monday, February 05, 2001 10:25 AM
To: 'Karsten Riemer'; Duane Nickull
Cc: tmcgrath@tedis.com.au; ebXML-Architecture List
Subject: RE: Final Review Instructions

>>>>>>>Comments inline

-----Original Message-----
From: Karsten Riemer [mailto:Karsten.Riemer@east.sun.com]
Sent: Monday, February 05, 2001 9:55 AM
To: Duane Nickull
Cc: Karsten Riemer; tmcgrath@tedis.com.au; BrianE@DataChannel.com;
ebXML-Architecture List
Subject: Re: Final Review Instructions

Thanks Duane,

You may just have turned a "no" vote into a "yes" vote,
I will know when I see what you submit at end of day,

thanks,
-karsten

>Karsten:
>
>I am okay with this and your earlier comments about the titles are good
>too so Brian and I will address these.
>
>Thanks for the comments.
>
>Duane
>
>Karsten Riemer wrote:
>>
>> I would remove it altogether,
>> The only reference, if any, to the Open-EDI ISO spec should be related to
>UMM.
>>
>> UMM is the methodology that is recommended for analyzing and defining
>Business
>> Processes and Business Documents. It has nothing to do with the methodology
>we
>> used (if any) to develop the ebXML architecture itself or the ebXML
>> specifications themselves.
>>

>>>>>>Changes made in the spec so that UMM references Open-edi, not ebXML.

>> -karsten
>>
>> >
>> >
>> >Karsten Riemer wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Tim, Duane, Brian,
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> But the second one remains an issue in terms of ebXML direction and
>> >> architecture. In the resolution, the TA team said: "We are defining the
>> >ebXML
>> >> reference architecture as adopted from the Open-EDI ISO spec".
>> >>>>>
>> >
>> >Karsten:
>> >
>> >I will talk to Brian but I think this is a typo.  It meant to say we
>> >were using the Open-EDI ISO Spec METHODOLOGY as a reference point to
>> >"START" defining the  ebXML architecture. Specifically, this refers to
>> >the BOV and FSV distinction.  We did not adopt the Open-EDI
>> >specification as a part of the ebXML Architecture.
>> >

>>>>>Change accepted. Specification now references Open-edi in the context of UMM instead of using the ebXML Architecture Reference Model.

Regards,

Brian