Comments on the BPM Meta-model

[LONJON Antoine <ALonjon@MEGA.com>]

As Karsten proposed, I think there should be an association between
BusinessService and BusinessServiceInterface. But, it this case, the
assocation between Party and BusinessInterface should disapper.

- As stated in the BPM document comments, Business Interface should be
associated to Partner Role and not to Transaction. Indeed a business service
interface is the implementation of one side of Transaction, hence the
implementation of a Partner role.

- In such a case, Partner Role would better be a composite of Transaction
(Composite association) otherwise we wouldn’t know which Transaction the
Business Service Interface would be the implementation of.



Antoine LONJON
MEGA International
33.1.42.75.40.30
ALonjon@Mega.com <mailto:ALonjon@Mega.com>