ebxml-bp message

Subject: RE: Comment

From: srh@us.ibm.com
To: Bob Haugen <linkage@interaccess.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2000 10:38:36 -0500




|In my recent proposal to simplify the BusinessProcessDefinition
|hierarchy, in response to Karsten Riemer's issue #k, any level
|of the hierarchy could have OrderingRules and TransactionConstraints
|that could manage sequences of Transactions.   I think this would
|handle your issue.
|

It seems then that the StepDefinition should be associated to OrderingRule,
in order to provide it at the Step level and also BusinessTransaction.
But it does not seem a StepDefinition should have
BusinessTransactionContraint.
Correct?

Scott Hinkelman
Senior Software Engineer, SWG IBM Austin
512-823-8097 (TL 793-8097) (Cell: 512-940-0519)
srh@us.ibm.com, Fax: 512-838-1074