[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: Collaboration Services (was: Business Service Interface)
Would you care to help me replace "collaborating workflows" with some other phrase. I do admit 'workflow' is very general term, especially when you've seen half a dozen vendors claim to have workflow and all implementations are different. I think the phrase needs to be something simple to understand / not too technical, yet something for the person in the street that triggers a 'Very cool !' response. Dave -----Original Message----- From: Bob Haugen [mailto:linkage@interaccess.com] Sent: Sunday, October 22, 2000 5:02 PM To: 'Welsh, David' Cc: 'ebXML-BP@llists.ebxml.org'; ebxml-tp@lists.ebxml.org Subject: RE: Collaboration Services (was: Business Service Interface) <David Welsh> So ... in simple terms ... we should have "collaborating workflows" representing (core) business processes (expressed in XML and made from core components) hosted in the Registry/Repository and normally 'qualified thru some standard methods' when a trading part??? (with all respect to party or partner) agreement is automatically negotiatied ? </David Welsh> Very cool! I like it! (except for the term "workflow", but I suppose that depends on what is meant.) Thanks for condensing, Bob Haugen
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC