Re: Metamodel meeting 21 Nov.

[Jim Clark <jdc-icot@lcc.net>]

Karsten et al,

I object to the creation of a new meta model, the current metamodel and the semantics
it defines are wholly suitable. Your defintion and description of the current
metamodel is incorrect and disingenuous.

This current direction will cause ebXML not to be interoperable with TMWG,
RosettaNet, Swift and CGI.

Jim Clark

Karsten Riemer wrote:

> The weekly BP/CC metamodel meeting is scheduled for 21 Nov. at
> 9 am PST, 12 pm EST.
>
> To access the call, dial 888-699-0348 domestically and +1 732-336-6000
> internationally, with  a PIN of 8154#.
>
> We will be continuing the work we started at Tokyo on creating a hand-off
> layer between BP and TP. We now refer to that as the specification metamodel
> as distinguished from the methodology metamodel. I attach the explanation of
> the relationship between the two, as I submitted it to the TA team at Tokyo.
>
> The specification metamodel will be part of the March timeframe Infrastructure
> Release, because it is needed in support of the TP specification, so we will
> be working at an accellerated pace on this, including the metamodel/TP
> face-to-face in Boston December 6-8.
>
> thanks,
> -karsten
>
>   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                                           Name: MetamodelArchitectureChapter.doc
>    MetamodelArchitectureChapter.doc       Type: WINWORD File (application/msword)
>                                       Encoding: BASE64
>                                    Description: Word.Document.8
begin:vcard 
n:Clark;James
tel;cell:936.524.4424
tel;work:936.264.3366
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
adr:;;;;;;
version:2.1
email;internet:jdc-icot@lcc.net
fn:James Clark
end:vcard