Re: MetaModel description

[Karsten Riemer <Karsten.Riemer@east.sun.com>]

Anders,
The document I gave you was reviewed by Paul Levine, team lead for BP.
I am aware that Jim and I have differences of opinion of how we will arrive at
the specification metamodel, but the concept of the specification metamodel
has been discussed in open ebXML forums for the last 3 weeks, and the write-up
I gave you reflects what the BP metamodel team has agreed to. What needs to be
ironed out is the (strong) disagreement that Jim and I have on how to achieve
such a specification metamodel.

-karsten


>Anders,
>
>When is your next conference call. I would like to be on it as I and others
>streneously object to
>the inclusion of this material in any architecture document. It does not
>reflect the general
>consenus of the BP team but rather the viewpoint of a few and has some
>grossly mis-stated concepts
>regarding the metamodel.
>
>Jim Clark
>
>
>"agrangard@nycall.com" wrote:
>
>> Attached you will find a contribution from Karsten Riemer describing the
>BP
>> meta model. I suggest that we discuss it at the next conference call, so
>it
>> would be good if Karsten or someone from that team could participate. I
>will
>> send you the workplan including the dates for the conference calls as soon
>> as I have them confirmed with Melanie.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Anders Grangard
>> Edifrance
>> Ingénieur - Consultant en Commerce électronique
>> Tel: +33 (0)1 42 91 62 24
>> http://www.edifrance.org
>>
>>   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>                                        Name:
>MetamodelArchitectureChapter.zip
>>    MetamodelArchitectureChapter.zip    Type: Zip Compressed Data
>(application/x-zip-compressed)
>>                                    Encoding: base64