[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: placement of timing/security parameters
Please verify that the following, which are currently in "Abstract Attribute" have gone away; isSecureEntity isSignatureEntity > -----Original Message----- > From: Karsten Riemer [SMTP:Karsten.Riemer@East.Sun.COM] > Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2001 4:23 PM > To: jdc-icot@lcc.net > Cc: ebxml-bp@lists.ebxml.org; cory-c@dataaccess.com > Subject: placement of timing/security parameters > > Hi Jim, > Before Cory finalizes the model and DTD, please verify that this is the > correct distribution of timing/security parameters on the various classes: > > > BinaryCollaboration: > timeToPerform > > BusinessTransactionActivity: > timeToPerform > isConcurrent > > BusinessTransaction: > isSecureTransportRequired > isReliableTransportRequired > > RequestingBusinessActivity: > IsAuthorizationRequired > IsNonRepudiationRequired > TimeToPerform > TimeToAcknowledgeAcceptance > TimeToAcknowledgeReceipt > isNonRepudiationOfReceiptRequired > > > RespondingBusinessActivity: > isIntelligibleCheckRequired > > InformationEntity: > isConfidential > isTamperProof > isAuthenticated > > > Jim, this conforms with the diagram you sent me, but please confirm > anyway, > > thanks, > -karsten
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC