BP Issues Resolved

[Cory Casanave <cory-c@dataaccess.com>]

 <<Rational Rose - ebXMLSpecPlay.pdf>> 
The following is an informal summary of isses resolved in the BP mmetings
today, resultant MM is enclosed;


Issue 14: A transaction should be expressed as a document (set) exchange,
not an envelope exchange.  Get rid of document envelope.
Resolution: Eliminated

Issue 15: Get rid of document set, composition of document sets should be
the responsibility of the document model.
Resolution: Done

Issue: 16: Why not use RDF or XMI since they already map from XML.
Resolution: Bob has text.

Issue: 17: Remove document model, reference DTD (or schema)  and element
name.
Resolution: Done

Issue 18 Why not BPML? 
Resolution:  BPML never proposed for ebXml.  Reference Bob's text.
Integration points for ebXml have been UMM and OMG EDOC.

Issue 19: Can we use schema instead of DTD?
Resolution: Schema an option to define a document namespace.  DTD for
specification will be rendered as a schema.

Issue 20:Make ack messgaes compatible with RNIF 2.0
Resolution: isIntelligibleCheckRequired attribute and positive ack message.

Issue: 21: Include sequence diagrams with exceptions in section 6.
Resolution: To be done

Issue 10: Multiparty Collaboration choreography.
Resolution: Resolved to attempt to do this in short term, Accepting
proposals.  Cory will propose model extensions compatible with EDOC.

Issue 22: Better explanation of relationship between model and XML
representation.
Resolution: Karsten should do this.  We do not intend on changing the syntax
or model, just explaining it better.

Rational Rose - ebXMLSpecPlay.pdf