[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: XMI reality check
One of the issues for the Business Process Editor has been what format to use to store business process models for interoperability with UML tools. I am also encountering this same issue in other projects. XMI seems to be the "standard", but I have also heard lots of complaints. This is a general call for feedback on XMI, from people who have tried it: * What UML tools have you tried XMI with? * Have you tried to take the same XMI model and move it from one tool to another? * What problems did you encounter? * Were XMI models imported into a UML tool really ugly, even if they might have worked technically? * Any other XMI comments... * What's a better format, if any? (RDF?) Thanks a million, Bob Haugen
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC