Re: Formal Submission to the Quality Review Team

["Marcia L. McLure Ph.D." <marcia.mclure@mmiec.com>]

Bob,
Thank you for the first formal comment to one of our Analysis Team
documents.  Yes, there is a formal comment process/procedure and specific
persons (the document editors) who should receive your input. In the case of
the Negotiation Pattern Doc, the esteemed editor is Jamie Clark. Editors and
contact information can be found at the end of each document. The editors of
these documents may be unaware of the process and the need to develop an
issues log with specific columns capturing comment submitter, date of
comment submission,comment and resolution information, etc..  This
information should be shared with the group during our Wednesday morning
Analysis Team conference call.
Thanks Bob.
Marcia

----- Original Message -----
From: "Bob Haugen" <linkage@interaccess.com>
To: "'Marcia L. McLure Ph.D.'" <marcia.mclure@mmiec.com>;
<ebxml-bp@lists.ebxml.org>; <ebxml-ccbp-analysis@lists.ebxml.org>
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 5:00 AM
Subject: RE: Formal Submission to the Quality Review Team


> Forgive me for not noticing this earlier, but a new problem emerged
> when the Negotiation Pattern document got changed into a Commerce
> Patterns document:
>
> * The pattern name "ebXML Simple Negotiation Pattern" is gone.
> * The document does not explain that the Negotiation Pattern
> is only one, the first, of many possible commerce patterns.
>
> I suppose this message becomes the first formal comment.
> Does it need to be rewritten in some particular format and sent
> to some particular party, or will this do?
>
> -Bob Haugen
>