RE: ebXML and RosettaNet

["Welsh, David" <David.Welsh@nordstrom.com>]

Sounds like a good suggested agenda for a conf call (and a followup report
which could be shared with everyone) between ebXML players and some
RosettaNet members to talk thru the items below. Actually such a report
could be extremely useful to other vertical industry's to help place
themselves in the grander scheme of things. Maybe ?
My belief is ebXML and RN will actually be able to play well with each other
'in the sandbox' and where there's differences, I'm confident there's
natural convergence of services and solutions; there's lots of the same DNA
in both efforts.

Dave

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bob Haugen [mailto:linkage@interaccess.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2001 5:08 AM
> To: ebxml-bp@lists.ebxml.org
> Subject: RE: ebXML and RosettaNet
> 
> 
> Maybe it would be useful to define what people mean,
> or what the possibilities might be, in the subject context:
> 
> * using RosettaNet documents with everything else ebXML
> * using RosettaNet PIPs with ebXML software at each end
>   (and maintaining expected PIP behavior)
> * PIPs with RNet software at one end and ebXML at the other
> * RosettaNet consortium migrating everything into ebXML
> * RosettaNet using ebXML TRP and keeping everything else as-is
> * some other configuration...
> * RosettaNet 1.0 vs 2.0 for all of the above...
> 
> One question:  is it common for RosettaNet trading partners
> to have RNet software from different vendors?
> 
> -Bob Haugen
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word
> "unsubscribe" in the body to: ebxml-bp-request@lists.ebxml.org
>