ebxml-bp message

Subject: Re: Schema & BP Spec: Items for today's BP/CC meeting

From: "Paul R. Levine" <plevine@telcordia.com>
To: ebxml-bp@lists.ebxml.org
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 09:42:06 -0400


I agree with Brian as long as we are in compliance with the General ebXML
Business Requirement:

"Design rules for developing ebXML compliant XML documents are based on
approved W3C schema specifications."

Paul Levine


                                                                                                                 
                    "Hayes, Brian"                                                                               
                    <Brian.Hayes@Commer        To:     ebxml-bp@lists.ebxml.org                                  
                    ceone.com>                 cc:     (bcc: Paul R. Levine/Telcordia)                           
                                               Subject:     Schema & BP Spec: Items for today's BP/CC meeting    
                    04/16/01 03:03 PM                                                                            
                                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                 





Karsten wrote:
> An issue just raised by Neal: Should we include a W3C schema
> version of the
> SpecSchema along with (or instead of) the DTD? What is the
> recommendation from
> BP/CC - DTD or Schema, or both?

Time permiting, I strongly recommend we deliver a schema version.  DTDs are
not precise enough for defining interfaces (structure and strings) and the
BP Spec Schema is essentially and interface.

Brian

------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word
"unsubscribe" in the body to: ebxml-bp-request@lists.ebxml.org