Re: Difference between CPP-CPA specification and BP Specificationschema (Fwd)

[MiYoung Na <myna@esumtech.com>]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Karsten Riemer" <Karsten.Riemer@east.sun.com>
To: <ebxml-bp@lists.ebxml.org>
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 10:18 PM
Subject: Re: Difference between CPP-CPA specification and BP Specification schema (Fwd)


I tried to send this to BP analysis list but it bounced, so I am sending it as
a FYI  via the BP list instead.

>----------------Begin Forwarded Message----------------<

Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2001 09:12:11 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time)
From: Karsten Riemer <Karsten.Riemer@east.sun.com>
Subject: Re: Difference between CPP-CPA specification and BP Specification
 schema
To: "'ebxml-tp@lists.ebxml.org'" <ebxml-tp@lists.ebxml.org>
Cc: "'ebxml-bp-analysis@lists.ebxml.org'" <ebxml-bp-analysis@lists.ebxml.org>,
        chris.ferris@east.sun.com



I talked to Chris Ferris late last week, and he assured me that our new spec
schema is properly reflected in the new CPP/CPA spec. I just looked at version
0.941 that  Marty sent out, and it is still not reflected there. So just to
make sure, I re-attach the e-mail I sent out before my vacation. It has the
proper mapping. The DTD attached to  that e-mail is likely to change slightly
for 1.0, but the role mapping should not change.

thanks,
-karsten

>Hi 
>
>in the latest CPP-CPA specification Ver 9.41 line 723-745 says the following
>
>7.4.5 Role element
>The REQUIRED Role element identifies which role in the Process Specification
>the Party is capable of supporting via the ServiceBinding element(s)
>siblings within this CollaborationRole element.
>
>The Role element has the following attributes:
>· a REQUIRED name attribute,
>· a FIXED xlink:type attribute,
>· a REQUIRED xlink:href attribute.
>
>7.4.5.1 name attribute
>The REQUIRED name attribute is a string that gives a name to the Role. Its
>value is taken from one of the following sources in the Process
>Specification[ebBPSS] that is referenced by the ProcessSpecification element
>depending upon which element is the "root" (highest order) of the process
>referenced:
>· initiator attribute of the binary-collaboration element,
>· responder attribute of the binary-collaboration element,
>· from attribute of the business-transaction-activity element,
>· to attribute of the business-transaction-activity element,
>· from attribute of the collaboration-activity element,
>· to attribute of the collaboration-activity element,
>· name attribute of the business-partner-role element.
>
><Nita>
>this requires to reflect the current [BPSS] attribute names. Moreover it
>implies that binary-collaboration may or may not be the root of a process.
>BP folks, is that so? 
>
></Nita>
>
>cheers
>
>- Nita

>----------------End Forwarded Message----------------<