Re: agenda for today's metamodel meeting

[Kenji Itoh <kenji41@attglobal.net>]

Dear Karsten and Kurt,

Thank you for providingDTD/example package.
However, regarding three xml files could not be
displayed due to some errors in dtd as follows;

dropshipSamples_2001_04_23.xml
   Error processing resource 'EbXMLProcessSpecification_
   2001_04\23.dtd'. 3 Position 87

SimpleEBXML_2001_04_23.xml
   Error processing resource 'EBXMLProcessSpecification_
   2001_04_23.dtd. 11, Position 87

SimpleOAG_2001_04_23.xml
   Error processing resource 'EBXMLProcessSpecification_
   2001_04_23.dtd' 3, Position 87

I am not familiar of these xml, dtd contents, so please let me
know how I can recover these errors.
Thanks a lot an so sorry for troubling you,
Kenji



----- Original Message -----
From: "Karsten Riemer" <Karsten.Riemer@east.sun.com>
To: <ebxml-bp@lists.ebxml.org>; <ebxml-core@lists.ebxml.org>
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 11:34 PM
Subject: agenda for today's metamodel meeting


> 888-699-0348 access code 3042# at 11 AM eastern time today.
>
> I attach latest DTD/example package received from Kurt yesterday.
>
> Agenda:
>
> 1. Transaction parameters (issues 131, 132, 119, 12)
>
>    Expected resolution: Retain UMM transaction constraint,
>    Proposal: move timeToAcknowledgeAcceptance and
isNonRepudiationOfReceipt to
> requesting activity?
>
> 2. Synchronous (issue 40, 58)
>
>    Expected resolution: Drop attribute isSynchronous and all associated
text?
>
> 3. Concurrent (issue 111):
>
>    Proposal: Drop attribute isConcurrent and all associated text?
>
> 4. Security Parameters (issue 57)
>
>    Expected Resolution: Split isSecureTransportRequired into three
attributes?
>    Proposal: Change boolean to Persistent/Transient/NO?
>
> 5. Legal (issue 134, 29-31, 42) Jamie's recommendations
>
>    Expected Resolution: Retain word isLegallyBinding, tighten text?
>    Expected Resolution: Change word isSuccess to positiveResponse (?)
>
> 6. Xpath/ID (issue 76)
>
>    Expected Resolution: Adopt Kurt's proposal 5?
>
> 7. Document Envelope (issue 120, #3)
>
>    Proposal: Rename DocumentFlow to DocumentEnvelope (UMM make
> DocumentEnvelope a
>    stereotype of ObjectFlow)?
>    Proposal: Change UMM to have notion of primary doc and attachments.?
>
> 8: New renaming issues (from BPE work):
>
>    Proposal: Rename Requires->Precondition ResultsIn->PostCondition?
>
> 9. Completion vs. Termination
>
>    Proposal: Leave as is. Otherwise a failure completion sounds like
success.
>
> Other discussion:
>
> Reconfirm that we will include a W3C schema version
>
> Any action items around issue 135 multiparty
>
> Any action items around issue 136 use of alternative
DocumentSpecifications
> (OAG, Rosetta, etc)?
>
> Reactions to section 5 and 6.
>
> Subcommittee: Document any remaining UMM/BPSS alignment issues
>
>
>
>
>