Re: BPSS (was) Approved eBTWG project teams

[Klaus-Dieter Naujok <knaujok@home.com>]

On Friday 24 August 2001 11:24, James Bryce Clark wrote:

> So I suggest that we either (1) have no BPSS group (leaving
> technical changes to editors appointed by ebTWG exec, whatever it
> is), or (2) approve a small-scale technical-changes only group
> project fro 1.1, which explicitly excludes material changes to
> models and objects.  In other words, do what CPPA is doing, and
> put out a good, stable 1.1 which simply fixes any holes in 1.0.  
> Let the substantive groups -- monitored commitments, BSI,  etc.
> -- work the big picture issues with their domain-specific experts
> for a while, before getting into a pitched discussion of what 2.0
> should be.

Jamie,

Thanks for your recap on this topic. I would support option 2 as 
being a valid one with the conditions identified by you.

Regards,

Klaus

-- 
Klaus-Dieter Naujok             UN/CEFACT/eBTWG & TMWG Chair
IONA Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, Chief Scientific Officer