[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: XMI reality check
Yes. One could generate a DTD or XML document or XMLschema from a model stored as RDF. Jim "Welsh, David" wrote: > I've heard very good longer term experience story's about using RDF from the > publishing/library world, and I couldn't miss the almost religious sermons > from some @ the W3C on RDF as the way of the future Semantic Web. > It would appear RDF offers the opportunity to encapsulate business process > models, during the analysis, design and 'record for posterity' stage in > business process life cycles. I take it then in the grander scheme of things > then, one could generate SpecSchema runtime XML from business process models > in RDF. Sounds like it could. > Dave > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jim Clark [mailto:jdc-icot@lcc.net] > > Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2001 7:29 AM > > To: Race Bannon > > Cc: 'Bob Haugen'; 'ebXML-BP@llists.ebxml.org'; 'ebXML-CCBP-Analysis > > (E-mail)' > > Subject: Re: XMI reality check > > > > > > I FULLY concur with Mr Bannon and vote for that format. > > > > Jim Clark > > e2open > > 936.264.3366 > > > > Race Bannon wrote: > > > > > My vote: RDF is the better format. > > > > > > Race Bannon, Ph.D. > > > Director of Training and Documentation > > > Information Architects > > > 4064 Colony Road > > > Charlotte, NC 28211 > > > Ph: 704/367-2105 > > > Fx: 704/442-0693 > > > Toll Free: 877/INFOARC x. 2105 > > > iA: http://www.ia.com > > > iA Education: http://www.ia.com/ia/training/index.htm > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Bob Haugen [mailto:linkage@interaccess.com] > > > Sent: Friday, March 16, 2001 8:46 AM > > > To: 'ebXML-BP@llists.ebxml.org'; 'ebXML-CCBP-Analysis (E-mail)' > > > Subject: XMI reality check > > > > > > One of the issues for the Business Process Editor has been > > > what format to use to store business process models for > > > interoperability with UML tools. I am also encountering > > > this same issue in other projects. > > > > > > XMI seems to be the "standard", but I have also heard > > > lots of complaints. > > > > > > This is a general call for feedback on XMI, from people > > > who have tried it: > > > * What UML tools have you tried XMI with? > > > * Have you tried to take the same XMI model and > > > move it from one tool to another? > > > * What problems did you encounter? > > > * Were XMI models imported into a UML tool > > > really ugly, even if they might have worked > > > technically? > > > * Any other XMI comments... > > > * What's a better format, if any? (RDF?) > > > > > > Thanks a million, > > > Bob Haugen > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word > > > "unsubscribe" in the body to: ebxml-bp-request@lists.ebxml.org > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word > > > "unsubscribe" in the body to: ebxml-bp-request@lists.ebxml.org > >
begin:vcard n:Clark;James tel;cell:936.524.4424 tel;work:936.264.3366 x-mozilla-html:FALSE org:I.C.O.T. adr:;;10987 Quinlan N Lake;Conroe;TX;77303; version:2.1 email;internet:jdc-icot@lcc.net title:Principal Consultant fn:James Clark end:vcard
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC