[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: XMI reality check
Hi John, > > Where XMI differs from RDF in transport of model content is that XMI > conforms to the more general UML domain, while RDF can be > restricted by use > of namespaces to a specific problem domain. Sounds like more efficiency in RDF. > The ability to > express a meta > structure in RDF and validate it means better control on the > applicability > of model content. Cool, so I can also include CAD drawings of my engine part assembly as some of the quality control reference material with my business process model logic expressed in my UMM/ebXML business models, for my new car assembly plant dock receiving procedures that I'd use with parts vendors ! And further if I embed audio track metadata to work with some of the failure post condtions on the receiving process, I could imagine 'active documents' in ebXML somewhere in the not to distant future. I already see the W3C has a note on "Describing and retrieving photos using RDF and HTTP". > When using models in a constricted domain > like b2b, it is > attractive to be able to validate model content according to a meta > structure. > Keep going. I like it ! > For what it is worth, Edifecs undertook a formal RDF > initiative in late 1999 > and early 2000. This initiative resulted in GXML/RDF > (guidelineXML in RDF), > which is attached. This effort focused on the messages > rather than the > process, although it does allow association to BusinessAction elements > (placing the message in the context of a process). Contained > within this > document are formal modeling in UML of the expression of EDI, > Flatfile and > BCF (which is UMM and RosettaNet compliant) structures in RDF > complete with > references to complete online examples. > Always head of the curve ! > The examples referenced by the document were tested with the ICS-FORTH > Validating RDF Parser (VRP) from the FORTH Institute of > Computer Science. > Free parsers too ! > If there is any interest in this work we would be happy to > contribute it to > the efforts underway. > Hang onto that thought. Dave > Regards, > John > > > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC