[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Addition to UMM-BPSS changes
In the BPSSV1.00A.doc, there are some unfortunate sentences that make it seem like BPSS is a modeling tool, or the standard for business process models (as opposed to runtime XML business process specification documents), in contradiction to my understanding of how this issue is being resolved (model = UMM, XML runtime doc = BPSS). I propose the following changes: Delete lines 369-371: Any methodologies and/or metamodels used for the creation of ebXML compliant Business Process Specifications must at minimum support these elements and relationships. In lines 613-615, Change 'modeling' to 'composition' so the paragraph reads as follows: Although this section, for purposes of introduction, discusses the model from the bottom up, the Specification Schema very much is intended for composition from the top down, re-using existing lower level content as much as possible. -Bob Haugen
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC