A job for coordination if there ever was one

[Joseph Baran <joebaran@extol.com>]

FYI:

For any of the coordination group who are not familiar with the issues 
prompting this, you can review the TA archives at:

http://lists.ebxml.org/archives/ebxml-architecture/200007/maillist.html

The relevant threads are "ebXML metamodel write-up" and "BPM not in 
alignment".
The TA group has scheduled a session in San Jose on Tuesday at 11:00 AM to 
discuss this issue.
Tim posted a suggestion to the effect that perhaps the coordination group 
ought to be represented, and TA lead Anders Grangard responded positively.
Joe Baran



-----Original Message-----
From:	duane [SMTP:duane@xmlglobal.com]
Sent:	Monday, July 31, 2000 4:39 PM
To:	ebxml-architecture@lists.ebxml.org
Cc:	Lisa M. Shreve
Subject:	Problem

WHo is our liaison with the BPM  group?

THe BPM group has been mandating a discovery marketplace for some time
now in their spec. I didn;t read it until now becuase I have relied on
our liaison to make note of any large differences.  The rift between the
two seems very large over this one issue.

All liaisons:

We have a job to do and it has to be done professionally.  Please make
sure you read the specifications and work of the appropriate teams you
are charged with liaising with.  I don;t mean to sound harse but I have
put in a lot of time and effort as others have on ebXML and we can't get
derailed by lack of communication.

I have put this issue to the steering committee to discuss.  I would
appreciate it if our liaison to BPM can go through the spec and make an
issues list of the scope problems.

THank you

Duane Nickull
duane@xmlglobal.com