FW: ebXML: TA doc, sect 10, RegRep, redone as more of an Arch doc

[Joseph Baran <joebaran@extol.com>]

FYI:

Assuming that the TA document will again be on the agenda..... 

The message & attachment below just appeared on the TA list. I haven't tried to really analyze it yet, but it is only two pages.

It appears to me that it might be a start at producing an example of the level that the TA document should be at.

In addition, his last comment is very interesting: "I have resoures that can be committed to this effort"


------------- Begin Forwarded Message -------------

Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2000 12:46:15 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jeff Suttor <jsuttor@jurassic>
Subject: ebXML: TA doc, sect 10, RegRep, redone as more of an Arch doc
To: ebxml-architecture@lists.ebxml.org

Feedback from ebXML participants seems to be that the TA doc is not structured 
like an architectural doc.

I agree with this so I took the TA doc, sect 10, RegReg, and removed all 
requirements, specifications and implementation details.  Now that all 
non-Architecture content has been removed, it needs more fleshing out with new 
content to be complete.  The document in its current state is attached to this 
message.

I would like to propose that we incrementally rewrite the TA doc as an 
Architectural doc.  All of the good work that was done on the original doc that 
is not Architectural in nature, can be reused by other teams.  e.g. some use 
cases can be sent to the project teams to be used for their functional specs, 
etc.

I have resoures that can be committed to this effort.

What does the project team think?

--
Jeff.Suttor@Sun.com      http://sun.com/xml
XML Technology Center    http://web.eng/xml

------------- End Forwarded Message -------------

RegRep.doc