Re: Plea for models to be available...

[Philip Goatly <philip.goatly@bolero.net>]

I agree with that .pdf sucks for models

Cheers, Phil
----- Original Message -----
From: "Petit, John" <jpetit@kpmg.com>
To: "'Arnold, Curt'" <Curt.Arnold@hyprotech.com>;
<ebxml-core@lists.ebxml.org>
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2000 9:00 PM
Subject: RE: Plea for models to be available...


> I second that opinion as .pdf is a poor format for diagrams of any kind.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Arnold, Curt [mailto:Curt.Arnold@hyprotech.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2000 3:50 PM
> To: ebxml-core@lists.ebxml.org
> Subject: Plea for models to be available...
>
>
> One of the annoying aspects of OMG specs is that they include a lot of UML
> diagrams, but rarely make the model available in electronic form.  So, one
> of the first things you have to do is to manually
> construct a model from the diagrams with all the potential for mistyping,
> etc.
>
> It would be helpful if the models behind ebXML could be published in XMI
> and/or Rose .mdl format in addition to diagrams appearing in documents.
>
****************************************************************************
*
> The information in this email is confidential and may be legally
privileged.
> It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone
else
> is unauthorized.
>
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
distribution
> or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is
prohibited
> and may be unlawful. When addressed to our clients any opinions or advice
> contained in this email are subject to the terms and conditions expressed
in
> the governing KPMG client engagement letter.
>
****************************************************************************
*
>