Re: Registry concern with specifying common vertical structures

[Joe Sabado <joe.sabado@gte.net>]

please, please, please. Can someone help me unsubcribe from this list. I've
gone to www.ebxml.org and unsubscribed and i get a confirmation that I've
been unsubscribed from all lists. I've done this twice, but I am still
getting messages.


----- Original Message -----
From: Farrukh Najmi <najmi@east.sun.com>
To: Scott Hinkelman <srh@us.ibm.com>
Cc: David RR Webber <Gnosis_@compuserve.com>; ebxml repository
<ebxml-regrep@lists.ebxml.org>; Ram Kumar <rkumar@msi.com.au>; Mary Kay
Blantz <mblantz@netfish.com>; <ebxml-core@lists.ebxml.org>
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2001 7:52 AM
Subject: Re: Registry concern with specifying common vertical structures


> Scott,
>
> As I mentioned in the meeting yesterday it is common for registry specs to
> define PostalAddress (UDDI defines Address as a type, OASIS defines the
> attributes of address but not the type, ISO 11179n defines type). I think
we
> need the type in the model. The attributes could be tweaked.
>
> Just my 2cents.
>
> Scott Hinkelman wrote:
>
> > ISO?, CIQ?, HR-XML?, *?
> > I still question if PostalAddress should be in scope for formal
> > specification of the ebXML Registry at all.
> >
> > Scott Hinkelman, Senior Software Engineer
> > XML Industry Enablement
> > IBM e-business Standards Strategy
> > 512-823-8097 (TL 793-8097) (Cell: 512-940-0519)
> > srh@us.ibm.com, Fax: 512-838-1074
> >
> > David RR Webber <Gnosis_@compuserve.com>@compuserve.com> on 03/14/2001
> > 09:28:56 PM
> >
> > To:   ebxml repository <ebxml-regrep@lists.ebxml.org>, Ram Kumar
> >       <rkumar@msi.com.au>, Mary Kay Blantz <mblantz@netfish.com>
> > cc:
> > Subject:  RE: Registry concern with specifying common vertical
structures
> >
> > Reply from Ram - looks more promising than
> > first thought.
> >
> > This - and W.Kammerer on ISO seem possibles.
> >
> > Mary-Kay - comments?
> >
> > DW.
> >
> > -------------Forwarded Message-----------------
> >
> > From:     "Ram Kumar", INTERNET:rkumar@msi.com.au
> > To:  , INTERNET:ciq@lists.oasis-open.org
> >      , INTERNET:ebxml-regrep@lists.ebxml.org
> >      "'Karl Best'", INTERNET:karl.best@oasis-open.org
> >      "'David RR Webber'", Gnosis_
> >
> > Date:     3/14/2001  9:29 PM
> >
> > RE:  RE: Registry concern with specifying common vertical structures
> >
> > David
> >
> > You are right that the work we are doing on name and address
> > standards is fairly heavy stuff. But the beauty is that it covers
> > any application that want to use simple representation of the name
> > and address to very detailed representation of name and address
> > elements. For example, if you have a postal address say,
> >
> > 23 Archer Avenue East
> > Boulder, Colorado 12345-8976
> >
> > Following are some of the ways that you can represent the above address
> > using the XML standard we are working on:
> >
> > <address>23 Archer Avenue East
> >                 Boulder, Colorado 12345-8976
> > </address>
> >
> > OR
> >
> > <address>
> >   <addressline1>23 Archer Avenue East</addressline1>
> >   <addressline2>Boulder, Colorado 12345-8976</addressline2>
> > </address>
> >
> > OR
> >
> > <address>
> >   <streetnumber>23</streetnumber> <streetname>Archer</streetname>
> > <streettype>Avenue</streettype>
> > <streetpostdirection>East</streetpostdirection>
> > <cityname>Boulder</cityname> <statename>Colorado</statetame>
> > <postcode>12345</postcode> <extendedpostcode>8976</extendedpostcode>
> > </address>
> >
> > OR
> >
> > <address>
> > <street>23 Archer Avenue East</street>
> > <city>Boulder</city><state>Colorado<./state>
> > <postcode>12345-8976</postcode>
> > </address>
> >
> > This is the level of flexibility that we provide in our standard.
Moreover,
> > please note
> > that our standard work can handle atleast more than 40-50 country
address
> > structures.
> > The point I am trying to make is that it is not compulsary to define all
> > the
> > postal elements
> > to represent an address as you state. Most of the elements are optional.
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Ram
> > Chair, CIQ TC
> > OASIS
> >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: David RR Webber [mailto:Gnosis_@compuserve.com]
> > > > > Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2001 8:29 AM
> > > > > To: Karl Best
> > > > > Cc: ebxml-regrep@lists.ebxml.org; ciq@lists.oasis-open.org
> > > > > Subject: RE: Registry concern with specifying common vertical
> > > > > structures
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Message text written by Karl Best
> > > > > >
> > > > > RegRep'ers:
> > > > >
> > > > > There is an OASIS technical committee (Customer Information
> > > > > Quality, CIQ)
> > > > > working on this stuff; their work is fairly far along. Is
> > > > > there a way to
> > > > > coordinate efforts?
> > > > >
> > > > > </karl><
> > > > >
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >
> > > > > Karl,
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm not sure that's the right answer - but it is an answer.
> > > > >
> > > > > Being on that TC and looking at the solution they are
> > > > > moving too - its awfully top heavy just for a registry
> > > > > entry owner details entry!!!
> > > > >
> > > > > Bit likely signing up for a new telephone line and having
> > > > > to state your mothers brothers uncles dad's date of birth.
> > > > >
> > > > > A sub-set of their approach may work , where the DTD
> > > > > has been skilfully restructured to make a simple highly
> > > > > level 90:10 possible - with options for greater
> > > > > granularity for the extended cases.
> > > > >
> > > > > This is another one of those - with 36hrs in a day we
> > > > > can get to it things....
> > > > >
> > > > > DW.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word
> > > > > "unsubscribe" in the body to: ciq-request@lists.oasis-open.org
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> > ----------------------- Internet Header --------------------------------
> > Sender: rkumar@msi.com.au
> > Received: from mailin5.bigpond.com ([139.134.6.78])
> >      by spdmgaac.compuserve.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/SUN-1.9) with ESMTP id
> > VAA19921
> >      for <Gnosis_@compuserve.com>; Wed, 14 Mar 2001 21:28:32 -0500 (EST)
> > Received: from ram-kumar-pc ([139.134.4.54]) by
> >           mailin5.bigpond.com (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with SMTP
> >           id GA7WEQ00.26A; Thu, 15 Mar 2001 12:32:50 +1000
> > Received: from DC-29-207.bpb.bigpond.com ([203.40.29.207]) by
> > mail6.bigpond.com (Claudes-Lavish-MailRouter V2.9c 11/5205653); 15 Mar
2001
> > 12:27:54
> > From: "Ram Kumar" <rkumar@msi.com.au>
> > To: "'David RR Webber'" <Gnosis_@compuserve.com>,
> >         "'Karl Best'" <karl.best@oasis-open.org>,
> >         <ebxml-regrep@lists.ebxml.org>, <ciq@lists.oasis-open.org>
> > Subject: RE: Registry concern with specifying common vertical structures
> > Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 12:11:54 +1100
> > Message-ID: <006101c0acf8$b5e49fe0$b81a28cb@ram-kumar-pc.intranet>
> > MIME-Version: 1.0
> > Content-Type: text/plain;
> >      charset="iso-8859-1"
> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> > X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
> > X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> > X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0
> > Importance: Normal
> > In-Reply-To:
> > X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word
> > "unsubscribe" in the body to: ebxml-regrep-request@lists.ebxml.org
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word
> > "unsubscribe" in the body to: ebxml-regrep-request@lists.ebxml.org
>
> --
> Regards,
> Farrukh
>
>