Re: ebXML Core Components Submission Version 1.03

[Tim McGrath <tmcgrath@tedis.com.au>]

whats the weather like in lord howe island?  i make it 5:00pm in london.
(see web page referenced)

i have to confess i do not know the time frame we are working to. the core components have two types of deliverables.  the candidate specification (the Naming Convention) requires a further 3 weeks of public review prior to the plenary (1 x 2 weeks and 1 x 1 week).  obviously, this is impractical.

i would suggest this forms part of the discussion on friday.  either way we all need to know as soon as possible.
 

James Whittle wrote:

Tim I will make these changes and get the Naming Conventions posted for
public review as soon as possible. With regard to the conference call if my
calculations are correct it will occur at 2.30am Sat GMT so I will not be
dialling in.

As as a matter of process what review time frame are we operating to? Please
could you send an up-dated time line so QRT and CC are working to the same
deadlines.

Thanks

James

-----Original Message-----
From: Tim McGrath [mailto:tmcgrath@tedis.com.au]
Sent: 19 April 2001 09:10
To: Blantz Mary Kay
Cc: James Whittle; 'Gait Boxman'; 'Becker Thomas'; Mike Adcock; Sue Probert;
'Lisa Shreve'; ebxml-core@lists.ebxml.org; Bob Sutor; Bill Smith; Ray
Walker; knaujok; knaujok; ebxml-stc@lists.ebxml.org; 'ebXML Coordination'
Subject: Re: ebXML Core Components Submission Version 1.03

The Quality Review team have completed their review of  "ebXML Naming
Convention for Core Components v1.03" document from the Core Components
project team as submitted on 12th April 2001.

We recommend that this document go forward for its second round of public
review, given the following condition.

A note is insert into Section 1 "Status of this Document", that reads...
Quality Review qualified statement:
This specification is one of several cornerstones for the overall Core
Components specifications.  Whilst it may be considered for stand-alone use,
its primary purpose is for use within an ebXML environment.  It has limited
value as an independent document.

I would ask that James Whittle be authorised to make these changes and then
liaise with Klaus and Karl Best in order that this be posted for public
review as soon as possible.

Our review has also identified some other issues that should be addressed
during the public review period.  These are included in the attached report.

The Quality Review team have also received a copy of the "Core Component and
Business Process Document Overview Version 1.03" document.

This is, almost by definition, the document that should be reviewed after
all the documents to which it refers.  Therefore, we feel unable to comment
meaningfully on this document at this time.  The analogy would be to ask for
comment on a roadmap when the roads had not yet been built.

I would like to take this opportunity to invite the team leads and editors
of the Core Components team to participate in a conference call with
representatives of the QR team to discuss these comments.  The call details
are:

Time:
Friday 20th April 09:30am Pacific summer time
(see: http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=20
<http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=20&month=4&amp;yea
r=2001&amp;hour=9&amp;min=0&amp;sec=0&amp;p1=224>
&month=4&amp;year=2001&amp;hour=9&amp;min=0&amp;sec=0&amp;p1=224)

Call numbers are:
USA  888 296 1938
International  304 345 7506 (limited number, sorry!)
participation code  262658

"Blantz, Mary Kay" wrote:

Hello all,

The attached zip files contain the Core Components submission to QRT to be
considered for public review. The following documents are included;

*       CC and BP Document Overview Ver 1.03
*       ebXML Naming conventions for Core Components and Business Processes
        Ver1.03
*       Comments logs for both of the above

We would like to stress the importance that comments following the procedure

documented at http://www.ebxml.org/specdrafts/specs_for_review.htm
<http://www.ebxml.org/specdrafts/specs_for_review.htm>
< http://www.ebxml.org/specdrafts/specs_for_review.htm
<http://www.ebxml.org/specdrafts/specs_for_review.htm> >  and point out that

comments which do not adhere to this criteria may not be considered.

All comments should be sent to James Whittle (james.whittle@e-centre.org.uk
< mailto:james.whittle@e-centre.org.uk
<mailto:james.whittle@e-centre.org.uk> > ) and copied to the Core Components

list serve (ebxml-core@lists.ebxml.org < mailto:ebxml-core@lists.ebxml.org
<mailto:ebxml-core@lists.ebxml.org> > )

Mary Kay Blantz

 <<CC and BP Document Overview Ver 1.03.zip>>  <<ebXML Naming Convention
Ver1.03.zip>>  <<CC and BP Dcument Overview Ver 1.03 comment log.zip>>
<<ebXML Naming convention Ver 1.03 comment log.zip>>

  ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                               Name: CC and BP Document
Overview Ver 1.03.zip
   CC and BP Document Overview Ver 1.03.zip    Type: Download File
(application/zip)
                                           Encoding: base64

                                          Name: ebXML Naming Convention
Ver1.03.zip
   ebXML Naming Convention Ver1.03.zip    Type: Download File
(application/zip)
                                      Encoding: base64

                                                          Name: CC and BP
Dcument Overview Ver 1.03 comment log.zip
   CC and BP Dcument Overview Ver 1.03 comment log.zip    Type: Download
File (application/zip)
                                                      Encoding: base64

                                                       Name: ebXML Naming
convention Ver 1.03 comment log.zip
   ebXML Naming convention Ver 1.03 comment log.zip    Type: Download File
(application/zip)
                                                   Encoding: base64

--
regards
tim mcgrath
TEDIS   fremantle  western australia 6160
phone: +618 93352228  fax: +618 93352142
 

--
regards
tim mcgrath
TEDIS   fremantle  western australia 6160
phone: +618 93352228  fax: +618 93352142