[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: where the qualifiers went...
DW, I am well aware of the UML model in the published docuemtation. IMO, it has not progressed to the point that it represents a 'sound model for defining Core Components'. Nor have I seen appreciable effect of that model in the ongoing work effort. Rether, I see spreadsheets of 'Core Components' which IMO do not conform even to that UML model. I hope and believe that the EWG/X12 effort will adopt a top down approach to Core Component design that will produce significant results by the end of this year. Cheers, Bob -----Original Message----- From: David RR Webber [mailto:Gnosis_@compuserve.com] Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 3:20 PM To: Miller, Robert (GXS) Cc: ebXML Core Subject: RE: where the qualifiers went... Message text written by "Miller, Robert (GXS)" >Good People, The hanging question is when are we going to have a sound UML model for defining Core Components? It is difficult (and I believe counter-productive) to 'define' a core component (e.g., 'amount') when we haven't first defined and agreed upon a UML model. <<<<<<<<<<<<<<< Bob, The information model in UML of a core component is already defined and available in the documentation published. DW.
Powered by eList eXpress LLC