OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ebxml-core message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]

Subject: RE: where the qualifiers went...


I am well aware of the UML model in the published docuemtation.  IMO, it has
not progressed to the point that it represents a 'sound model for defining
Core Components'.  Nor have I seen appreciable effect of that model in the
ongoing work effort.  Rether, I see spreadsheets of 'Core Components' which
IMO do not conform even to that UML model.

I hope and believe that the EWG/X12 effort will adopt a top down approach to
Core Component design that will produce significant results by the end of
this year.


-----Original Message-----
From: David RR Webber [mailto:Gnosis_@compuserve.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 3:20 PM
To: Miller, Robert (GXS)
Cc: ebXML Core
Subject: RE: where the qualifiers went...

Message text written by "Miller, Robert (GXS)"
>Good People,

The hanging question is when are we going to have a sound UML model for
defining Core Components?

It is difficult (and I believe counter-productive) to 'define' a core
component (e.g., 'amount') when we haven't first defined and agreed upon a
UML model. 


The information model in UML of a core component is already defined
and available in the documentation published.


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]

Search: Match: Sort by:
Words: | Help

Powered by eList eXpress LLC