Fwd: Re: [ebxml-dev] Re: Addendum to Automating execution of BizProcesses ... [long]; re: Trolls

["Michael C. Rawlins" <mike@rawlinsecconsulting.com>]

I tried to post this about six weeks ago and wondered why no one 
responded.  Seems that somehow my ability to post to this list was 
disabled, and then I was unsubscribed completely.  My thanks to Karl Best 
for looking into and fixing the problem.

This message's thread has long since died down (and we can all be 
thankful!), but the points and offer still stand.

Cheers,

Mike

>Delivered-To: rawlins-mike@rawlinsecconsulting.com
>To: ebxml-dev@lists.ebxml.org
>From: "Michael C. Rawlins" <mike@rawlinsecconsulting.com>
>Subject: Re: [ebxml-dev] Re: Addendum to Automating execution of Biz 
>Processes ... [long]; re: Trolls
>Reply-To: mike@rawlinsecconsulting.com
>CC: mike@rawlinsecconsulting.com, andrzej@chaeron.com
>Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 10:53:34 -0500
>X-Sender: rawlins-mike@w6.metronet.com
>X-Originating-Host: 63.121.92.200 [63.121.92.200]; Wed, 26 Jun 2002 
>16:11:09 GMT
>X-Mailer: Mailreader.com v2.3.29 (2001-07-20)
>X-Browser: Mozilla/4.61 [en] (WinNT; I), JavaScript: On
>
>A points toward constructive discussion and use of this listserv:
>
>1) Forgive me, but I do not feel inclined to have any futher dialogue
>with Andrzej Jan Taramina if he is going to degenerate into needless
>and inappropriate namecalling and personal remarks.
>
>2) Hi, Jamie - While you make some good points, I also think your
>personal characterizations and comments are tangential.  If you want
>to discuss e-commerce, I may be interested.  If you want to talk
>about *me* (or you, or anyone else for that matter) in a public forum,
>I decline to participate.
>
>3) I've already gone on record as saying there's too much noise to
>signal on this list, and that I don't want to contribute to it any
>further.  Mea culpa for having triggered this discussion (rat-hole,
>in my opinion).  But, maybe I'm reading the preferences of the readers
>inaccurately.  Do you really want to see me debate these types of
>issues in this forum, or would you rather keep this list to its original
>intended purpose.  Does anyone care?
>
>4) If the answer to 3 is that you think this listserv is an approprite
>forum for debate, then let me make this suggestion/offer.  Read/study
>my ebXML critique at www.rawlinsecconsulting.com/ebXML.  Write a
>rebuttal or refutation.  If the list participants want to see the
>debate here, post it on the list.  If not, post it yourself somewhere
>or I'll create a comments page and post it.  If the latter, I reserve
>the right to limit the number of comments posted and rebutted to
>what I can reasonably manage with my other (paying) commitments,
>and to ignore inappropriate comments.
>
>---------------------------
>Michael C. Rawlins
>Rawlins EC Consulting
>www.rawlinsecconsulting.com

---------------------------------------------------------------
Michael C. Rawlins, Rawlins EC Consulting
www.rawlinsecconsulting.com