OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
[ebxml-mktg] RE: [ebxml-dev] UBL Schemas Released for Public Review

David,
 
Since I actively participate in both UBL and CC, let me assure you that
they are in perfect harmony.  CCTS describes a syntax neutral approach to
developing semantically clear building blocks for syntax specific
expressions.  CCTS does not define how syntax specific expressions should
occur.  That is left up to the implementer - in this case UBL.
 
Let me assure everyone on this list that UBL is in full conformance with
the CCTS -  to include creating BIE's and identifying their underlying
CC's in strict compliance with the normative rules in the CCTS, and
supplying additional metadata to meet the CCTS storage requirements
identified in Section 7 of the CCTS.  The UBL naming and design rules have
a core guiding principle to create optimized XML from BIE's and the other
aspects of the CCTS, and I firmly believe that is what we are beginning to
see in the latest release version.  We will take feedback from external
activities, intertwine that feedback with the results of our final
discussions in UBL NDR, and publish the naming and design rules as a UBL
TC specification.  We hope that will happen during our May plenary in
London.
 
I would like to point out that UBL members and CCTS have been working very
closely over the last year and a half.  In fact a review of membership of
both bodies will show a significant overlap.  UBL has been instrumental in
providing feedback to the CCTS development process, and continues to fully
support CCTS as it completes the implementation verification phase.
 
Mark Crawford
Research Fellow - LMI XML Lead
W3C Advisory Committee, OASIS, RosettaNet Representative
Vice Chair - OASIS UBL TC & Chair Naming and Design Rules Subcommittee
Chair - UN/CEFACT XML Syntax Working Group
Editor - UN/CEFACT Core Components
_____
Logistics Management Institute
2000 Corporate Ridge, McLean, VA 22102-7805
(703) 917-7177 Fax (703) 917-7481 
Wireless (703) 655-4810
mcrawford@lmi.org
http://www.lmi.org
"Opportunity is what you make of it"

	-----Original Message----- 
	From: David Lyon [mailto:djlyon@froggy.com.au] 
	Sent: Tue 2/4/2003 4:57 PM 
	To: ebxml-dev@lists.ebxml.org; ebxml-mktg@lists.ebxml.org 
	Cc: 
	Subject: Re: [ebxml-dev] UBL Schemas Released for Public Review
	
	

	Hi Nick,
	
	Well, it looks to me like UBL has been an enourmous step forward,
and one
	can only expect that companies will extend and enhance the
messages to suite
	their own circumstances where neccessary. The big difference being
that with
	XML you don't neccessarily need to have different processing logic
if
	somebody adds a "banana freshness flag" like you do with EDI.
	
	You raise a good point, maybe it is time for someone to have a
fresh look at
	core components and see how it can be rehashed to somehow
accomodate UBL. At
	the moment, Core Components are rather abstract, more like some
sort of
	religious experience that is somewhat difficult to fathom. UBL is
what I
	would have expected Core Components to have been.
	
	Regards
	
	David Lyon
	
	----- Original Message -----
	From: "Nick Laqua" <Nick.Laqua@newtron.net>
	To: <ebxml-dev@lists.ebxml.org>; <ebxml-mktg@lists.ebxml.org>
	Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 9:33 PM
	Subject: RE: [ebxml-dev] UBL Schemas Released for Public Review
	
	
	Hi,
	
	can anybody give me a short hint how UBL is expected to
align/cooperate with
	the existing efforts within ebXML (Core Components, context driver
etc.) ?
	As I understood, the Core Components approach was meant to avoid
the typical
	problems of traditional standards like EDIFACT etc. (messages
being to
	generic on one hand and too complex/specific on the other hand)
leading to
	proprietary "enhancements" and adaptions.
	
	Isn't UBL just another attempt to install a "standard"
interoperable format
	(like EDIFACT etc.) ?
	
	Thx
	
	Nick
	
	-----Original Message-----
	From: Carol Geyer [mailto:carol.geyer@oasis-open.org]
	Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 9:40 PM
	To: ebxml-dev@lists.ebxml.org; ebxml-mktg@lists.ebxml.org
	Subject: [ebxml-dev] UBL Schemas Released for Public Review
	
	
	The first draft of a royalty-free data representation standard for
	electronic commerce has been released by the OASIS Universal
Business
	Language (UBL) Technical Committee.
	
	The UBL Library Content 0p70 Public Review release can be found at
	
	   http://oasis-open.org/committees/ubl/lcsc/0p70/
	
	A zip file containing the entire review set packaged for local
	installation can be downloaded from
	
	   http://oasis-open.org/committees/ubl/lcsc/0p70/UBL0p70.zip
	
	Intended to become international standards for electronic trade,
the UBL
	schemas contained in the review package specify machine-readable
XML
	representations of familiar business documents.  The seven basic
	documents covered in this release include Order, Order Response,
Simple
	Order Response, Order Cancellation, Despatch Advice, Receipt
Advice, and
	Invoice. Together, they can be used to implement a generic
buy/sell
	relationship or supply chain whose components fit existing trade
	agreements and are immediately understandable by workers in
business,
	supply-chain management (SCM), Electronic Data Interchange (EDI),
	accounting, customs, taxation, and shipping.
	
	These generic schemas are intended to work in a wide variety of
business
	contexts through custom extensions. Automated context
configuration will
	be addressed in a later phase of the effort. The schemas are also
	designed be used in their generic form in many ordinary business
	contexts without further modification.
	
	The business context in which the generic document types are
designed to
	function is detailed in the materials accompanying the release.
Other
	documentation includes the entire semantic model on which the
schemas
	are based, a description of the methodology by which the schemas
were
	created, and UML diagrams to aid in software design. The package
also
	contains alternative ASN.1 specifications for the UBL schemas that
allow
	ASN.1 tools to be used for UBL document transfers. Additional
	supplementary materials will be made available in a following
package
	update to be announced separately.
	
	The UBL schemas reflect a number of inputs, the most important of
which
	are the commercial xCBL schemas from Commerce One and SAP; the
ebXML
	Core Components Specification; early XSL stylesheet
implementations; and
	early feedback from the UBL Liaisons
	(http://oasis-open.org/committees/ubl/lsc/).  UBL schema design
follows
	the UBL Naming and Design Rules developed by the UBL NDR
Subcommittee
	(http://oasis-open.org/committees/ubl/ndrsc/). The definition of
UBL
	semantic content, based on existing practice in EDI and electronic
	marketplaces, has taken place in close alignment with ebXML Core
	Components methodology to ensure optimal integration into the
ebXML
	semantic registry.
	
	As works in progress, the materials in the Library Content 0p70
Public
	Review package do not yet have the status of an OASIS Open
Standard or
	an OASIS Committee Specification.  The construction of
experimental
	prototypes based on these materials is encouraged for the purpose
of
	generating input back to the committee process, but implementers
are
	strongly advised against basing commercial or mission-critical
	applications on the draft specifications.
	
	The OASIS UBL Library Content Subcommittee invites interested
parties to
	comment on this release directly to the Library Content
Subcommittee
	Editor, Bill Meadows (bill.meadows@sun.com), using the recommended
	feedback form at
	
	
	
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ubl/lcsc/0p70/UBL_Comment-0p1.rtf
	
	This release comment period applies from Monday, January 27th
until
	Monday, April 14th 2003. We welcome all comments and will ensure
to
	advise of our dispositions to any suggestions.
	
	The work of the OASIS UBL Technical Committee is open to public
view
	through the mail archives linked from the UBL home page:
	
	   http://oasis-open.org/committees/ubl/
	
	Formal input to UBL from industry data exchange organizations is
	provided through the UBL Liaison Subcommittee:
	
	   http://oasis-open.org/committees/ubl/lsc/
	
	Input from the general public is accepted through the ubl-comment
mail
	list:
	
	   http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl-comment/
	
	Interested parties are invited to comment on the work of the UBL
TC by
	subscribing to the ubl-comment list using the OASIS list manager:
	
	   http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl
	
	
	____________________________________________
	Carol Geyer
	Director of Communications
	OASIS
	http://www.oasis-open.org
	carol.geyer@oasis-open.org
	Voice: +1 978.667.5115 x209
	
	
	
	
	
	----------------------------------------------------------------
	The ebxml-dev list is sponsored by OASIS.
	To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
	manager: <http://lists.ebxml.org/ob/adm.pl>
	
	----------------------------------------------------------------
	The ebxml-dev list is sponsored by OASIS.
	To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
	manager: <http://lists.ebxml.org/ob/adm.pl>
	
	
	
	----------------------------------------------------------------
	The ebxml-dev list is sponsored by OASIS.
	To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
	manager: <http://lists.ebxml.org/ob/adm.pl>
	

<<attachment: winmail.dat>>



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]