Re: [ebxml-dev] Moving beyond UDDI: is it time to consider ebXML?

["Stephen Green" <stephengreenubl@gmail.com>]

One thing folk might not be able to do with UUDI but might
have to think about reinventing if they don't want to just use
ebXML:
the governance required in keeping separate the 'external'
(public) and 'internal' (private) parts of a process (transactions,
etc)
If governance is the new buzz word then that ought to be a
key part of it.
Can that be achieved using UUDI and WS-*? Is the intention
to reinvent that part of the SOA?

I reckon we all might like to know why there is a need to do
it all again without using ebXML then - perhaps the problem
is the openness and royalty-free nature of ebXML :-)

-- 
Stephen Green

Partner
SystML, http://www.systml.co.uk
Tel: +44 (0) 117 9541606

http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=matthew+22:37 .. and voice



On 06/05/07, David RR Webber (XML) <david@drrw.info> wrote:
>  From Joe McKendrick - Capitalizing on service-oriented architecture blog:
>
> http://blogs.zdnet.com/service-oriented/?p=868
>
> Enjoy, DW
>
> "The way to be is to do" - Confucius (551-472 B.C.)