RE: POC Demo's One-only, two-in-one, two-separate....?

[Sigmund Handelman/Watson/IBM <swhandel@us.ibm.com>]

Hello,

I am working with the POC team to have two complementary business processes
running side by side, and one of the scenarios will be "morphing" Core
Components from one context to the other as we discussed in our Automotive
Team.

Regards, Sig

Bob Haugen <linkage@interaccess.com> on 09/29/2000 02:00:24 PM

To:   Ebxml-Poc <ebxml-poc@lists.ebxml.org>
cc:
Subject:  RE: POC Demo's One-only, two-in-one, two-separate....?



Krishna Sankar wrote:
>    From what I understand, at the moment, the thought is that there will
be
>one eintegrated demo. The starting point of the integrated proposal is
>Mark's document sent on 9/28. I plan to work with Mark, Philippe, Sig et
al
>and send the first cut by COB Sunday.

Maybe you meant this in the first place, but demo planners
need to understand that the GCI and automotive content
come from different supply chains and so you can't really
mix and match, e.g. send cheese to the Ford assembly
line when they want gears.
The materials group had a proposal for taking a business
document from one context and adapting it for the other;
that would be cool.

Good luck,
Bob Haugen