RE: draft of AIAG proposal, to be merged with Krishna's work

[Krishna Sankar <ksankar@cisco.com>]

Hi,

	I plan to keep this document separate from the POC document so that the two
documents can vary independently. This document has a lot of Track 3 demo
(BP/CC) details, whichcan live outside the Tokyo POC controlling document.
But we need to include DTDs and examples for the Track 2 - Automotive
example, in the Tokyo POC document.

	The question I have is on the participant matrix in the BP/CC document.
Sig, how firm are they ? Philippe, did you get any feedback on this ?

	cheers

-----Original Message-----
From: Nicholas Kassem [mailto:nick.kassem@eng.sun.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2000 11:52 AM
To: Ebxml-Poc
Subject: Fwd: draft of AIAG proposal, to be merged with Krishna's work



>Importance: Normal
>Subject: draft of AIAG proposal, to be merged with Krishna's work
>To: Nicholas Kassem <Nick.Kassem@eng.sun.com>, ksankar@cisco.com,
>         Mark Hale <mark.hale@ajubasolutions.com>,
Farrukh.Najmi@east.sun.com,
>         "Scott Hinkelman/Austin/IBM" <srh@us.ibm.com>,
>         "Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM" <mwsachs@us.ibm.com>, lms@wwnet.com,
>         Melanie.McCarthy@gm.com
>From: "Sigmund Handelman/Watson/IBM" <swhandel@us.ibm.com>
>Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2000 11:46:33 -0400
>X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D01ML243/01/M/IBM(Release 5.0.4a |July
>24, 2000) at
>  10/04/2000 11:50:05 AM
>
>Hello,
>
>Mark and I met yesterday, and this is the updated AIAG POC, with Schema,
>Sample Data, and more details. I will be ready to answer questions on work
>in progress on the call tomorrow.
>
>Regards, Sig
>
>(See attached file: ebXMLBPCCpocProposal Materials Mgmt.doc)