Re: ebXML Headers Doc for Tokyo

[David RR Webber <Gnosis_@compuserve.com>]

Message text written by Farrukh Najmi
> 
Sanjay,

I have a problem with #5. Why does the Action have to have DocumentLabel
with
the suffix "Action" ? Why should the DocumentLabel alone not be sufficient?
It
is unique within the ServiceInterface. I use the action in my RR impl to
map to
a method call within the interface directly. Your suggestion would require
me to
parse the "Action" suffix out. Can we just stick with:

Action = DocumentLabel

BTW, If you have some cycles please look over the RR TRP messages I sent as
a
sanity check. Thanks for your help and support.
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

Farrukh.

This seems unreliable.   I'm using the combination of the header and the
payload,
since the RR payload explicitly names the action required; that should take

prescedence over the header in anycase.   The header may just have generic
information - depending on the diligence of the sender.

DW.