Re: Priorities for Vancouver POC

[Scott Hinkelman <srh@us.ibm.com>]

I believe the security issue for the next POC needs to be demonstrated in
context of the transport not Registry. Demonstrating security at the
Registry is similar to
the application layer and less needed at this point.

We need to demonstrate to the press that a secure messaging layer is
emerging.

Scott Hinkelman, Senior Software Engineer
XML Industry Enablement
IBM e-business Standards Strategy
512-823-8097 (TL 793-8097) (Cell: 512-940-0519)
srh@us.ibm.com, Fax: 512-838-1074



Farrukh Najmi <Farrukh.Najmi@east.sun.com> on 12/01/2000 12:04:27 PM

To:   "Munter, Joel D" <joel.d.munter@intel.com>
cc:   "'Prasad Yendluri'" <pyendluri@webmethods.com>,
      ebxml-regrep@lists.ebxml.org
Subject:  Re: Priorities for Vancouver POC



I strongly agree with Prasad. Ad hoc queries will make our Registry really
capable.

My priority is:

1. Ad hoc query.
2. Basic Authentication and Authorization

--

Regards,
Farrukh

"Munter, Joel D" wrote:

> reply:
>
> I strongly disagree. I believe that there are many issues yet to be dealt
> with that are heavily dependent upon a well designed and specified
security
> model.  e.g., We have yet to address the security aspects of
"distributed"
> registry/repository.  Security must be specified and worked sooner rather
> than later.
>
> In direct contrast, I believe that Ad Hoc query can easily be added
later.
>
> Joel
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Prasad Yendluri [mailto:pyendluri@webmethods.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 2:06 PM
> To: ebxml-regrep@lists.ebxml.org
> Subject: Re: Priorities for Vancouver POC
>
> Farrukh,
>
> IMHO security (authetication or authorization) is a well understood
aspect
> and will easily fall in place anytime.  Enriching the "registry"
> capabilities should be a priority. Hence I would vote for ad hoc query
> capability
>
> Thanks, Prasad
>
> Farrukh Najmi wrote:
>
> > In today's POC con call today I was asked to gather input from the
> > Registry team on our priorities for Registry functionality that should
> > be implemented and shown for Vancouver. The one guideline we must bear
> > in mind is that any functionality that we suggest for POC must be
> > speced.
> >
> > According to our phased delivery plan developed at Tokyo, we have the
> > following new functionality planned for our specs for Release 1
> > (Vancouver time frame):
> >
> > -Registry security (authentication and authorization)
> > -Ad hoc query capability
> >
> > Please share your sense of priorities for what Registry functionality
> > should be implemented and shown for the Vancouver POC. Please indicate
> > priority (1 being highre priority than 2).
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Farrukh

--
Regards,
Farrukh