[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: Negotiation problem
Stefano POGLIANI wrote: > There is a SINGLE CPA that is negotiated by the two parties. > Let's take the simple case of two parties stating they support one BP (it > will be > simple to extend to multiple BPs). > The CPP of PartyA references the BP_Sell_The_Flowers. The CPP of PartyB also > references the BP_SellThe_Flowers. PartyA and PartyB negotiate ONE CPA. > Your (2) (which says, if I am correct "The Respondant must calculate the > exact > same CPA as her potential client") is improbable in the sense that there is > only one > CPA I understand that only one CPA exists between the two parties for a given BP. The problems I face are: a) who authors it? b) how does the non-authoring party come into possession of it? Option 2 infers that both parties have with the same BP and CPP documents to start off with. They each create (independently) identical copies of the same CPA document. PS: My most recent copy of the CPP&A Specification is v0.1 dated 01/15/01. Is this up to date? -- // Michael Joya // XML Global Research and Development // 1818 Cornwall Ave. Suite 9 // Vancouver, Canada // 604-717-1100x230
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC