Subject: Re: WebDav?
Upon reading up on WebDav it seems that at the very least we should learn from its DASL (DAV Searching and Locating) protocol as well as locking/version control protocol (post November functionality). If any one has experience with WebDav or similar protocols, please share. -- Regards, Farrukh > >David, > >Thanks for the suggestion. I will look into it. BTW I must insist again that >we should have these conversations on the regrep list since I want us to engage >as a team, in a proper context and a specific purpose. For instance if anyone on >the >team has knoweldge of WebDav they can chime in. > >My initial think on WebDav is that it is an HTTP based technology, I prefer >eating our >own dog food and having all access to an ebXML registry be based on ebXML >transport. I was assuming this to be a high level design principal. Comments >anyone? > >I am taking the liberty to post to list since the interface issue is core >to the regrep work. > >-- > >Regards, >Farrukh > >>Thought for the weekend. >> >>Has anyone looked at WebDav as a set of open bindings >>that work with http and XML? >> >>At first blush, seems like we can do a lot of registry stuff with >>this and its an already defined open standard that even >>Microsoft supports. >> >>What am I missing here?!? >> >>Thanks, DW. > >
Powered by
eList eXpress LLC