Subject: RE: Interface Primitives (next steps).
Message text written by "Munter, Joel D" >i recommend that we "END THIS THREAD" now and ask that all on the Reg/Rep team dutifully review david's interfaces draft and consider its content for inclusion into the registry specification documentation that is currently under development and in review. <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< Joel, Done. Sorry about the confusion on the email headers. Agreed - in fact part of the problem has definately been my hectic travel schedule this week to the West coast and barrage of meetings - I knew I needed to call Farrukh earlier but was on airplanes at the wrong moments. I'm still a big believer in the power of the telephone over email. Anyway - result from todays tele-conf' was I made the "connect" with what Farrukh has been telling me for 5 days - and me not being able to see from the DTD doc's - that the 'why' is his disenchantment with the interface draft. Now I can fix all this - and I actually like a lot the approach Farrukh has - with the small caveat that as he noted - the devil is in the details. I'm looking at this weekend to do a document fragment - not a whole doc - that synergizes using his pieces with mine so far. Also - as Scott noted some of the DTD names are not clear, so I'll suggest some things there - but most urgently needed is a diagram showing the hierarchy and call sequence of them. If Farrukh does not beat me to putting that together - I'll draft that too this weekend. Talk with everyone on Monday hopefully. Thanks, DW.
Powered by eList eXpress LLC