[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: TP EDI Enabled ?
When I pointed out the need for unsolicited transmissions in the HIPAA world, Peter D. Pruyne responded that "Many insurers have claim acceptance done through clearinghouses, and therefore might not want (or perhaps even have) direct destination information to be published." That's true enough, where the insurer (payer or health plan) prefers to use the value-added benefits (whatever those might be) of a VAN-like clearinghouse, even when standard X12 transactions are being submitted by a provider. A clearinghouse's attractiveness becomes problematical when the cost can't be fobbed onto the provider; see 45 CFR 162.925(5) (Additional requirements for health plans): A health plan that ... requires [a provider] to use a health care clearinghouse to receive, process, or transmit a standard transaction may not charge fees or costs in excess of the fees or costs for normal telecommunications that the [provider] incurs when it directly transmits, or receives, a standard transaction to, or from, a health plan. That looks to me that if a provider is ready and willing to send claims via EDIINT (EDI over the Internet), or soon as payloads in ebXML TR&P messages, then the insurer will have to make itself capable of receiving them, or pay all the costs of having the intermediary (hub, spoke, e-business switch, clearinghouse, or what ever term du jour is used) relay the standard transactions. William J. Kammerer FORESIGHT Corp. 4950 Blazer Memorial Pkwy. Dublin, OH USA 43017-3305 +1 614 791-1600 Visit FORESIGHT Corp. at http://www.foresightcorp.com/ "Commerce for a New World"
Powered by eList eXpress LLC