ebXML requirements specification

[Stuart Campbell <stuart.campbell@tieglobal.com>]

Dear Mike


Attached are some rapid comments on the redlined requirements specification
recently referenced in an archived email date 12th January 2001

These comments are made after the deadline of 26th January so it is at your
discretion if they are processed.  If they are not processed please keep
them on record until the next review

I think it would be of great benefit to mandate each group chair to review
their section thoroughly and preferably review the whole document

Most comments i would class as editorial.  The one exception is the
continual referencing of some organisations as standards bodies when they
are clearly not IMHO

The attachment is zipped and all comments are in words comment mode (VIEW |
COMMENTs Menu)

I hope they are of some assistance.  Any clarifications please get back to
me

btw: I recently read and commented on the TA specification as well.  In
general i find a good deal of consistency between at least these two
specifications but equally the consistency is sometimes hard to fathom
because i believe the terminology has changed quite a lot and the
requirements specification tends to be a subset (i feel) of what is actually
being covered by the sub-specs.  Whether this is a good or bad thing is
still open to question.



Many thanks


STUART


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Stuart Campbell
Technical Strategy Director, TIE Holding NV
UK Office    T:+44 1270 254019   F:+44 7971 121013
Netherlands  T:+31 20 658 9335   F:+31 20 658 9901
Global       M:+44 7970 429251   E:stuart.campbell@TIEGlobal.com
		 W:www.TIEglobal.com P:www.stuartcampbell.co.uk
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

ebxml_RS_101.doc-sc3.zip