Re: Summary of findings of TA Spec. review.

[duane <duane@xmlglobal.com>]

Rik:

Well said!!!

Duane Nickull

Rik Drummond wrote:
> 
> I think these questions need to be address before further action is taken
> by ta, qr, stc, or the executive committee:
> 
> - the qr needs to say one of the sections is an architecture example so
> follow its structure for the others, or
> - give an example of an architecture from some where else so that ta will
> have a target they can address.
> 
> it is hard to fix something when statements "like it is not an architecture"
> are said with out detailed points of why it is not.
> 
> best regards, rik
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tim McGrath [mailto:tmcgrath@tedis.com.au]
> Sent: Saturday, September 23, 2000 11:31 PM
> To: sutor@us.ibm.com
> Cc: duane; Klaus-Dieter Naujok; Bill Smith; Ray Walker;
> ebxml-coord@lists.ebxml.org; ebxml-stc@lists.ebxml.org;
> ebxml-architecture@lists.ebxml.org
> Subject: Re: Summary of findings of TA Spec. review.
> 
> our summary states that we reviewed...
> ebXML Technical Architecture Specification Version:  (0.8.71) Release Date:
> 13/9/2000
> 
> we understand this to be the latest one (downloaded via Duane's URL).  it is
> certainly not the version discussed in San Jose.  we aplogise if that was
> the impression given.
> 
> i hope that clarifies the first point.
> 
> next !?
> 
> sutor@us.ibm.com wrote:
> 
> > Before we get too far on this, let's confirm that the QR team saw the
> > document
> > you thought they were supposed to see and then take it from there. Tim,
> > Nagwa?
> >
> > Bob
> > ..........................................................
> > Bob Sutor
> > Program Director, e-business Standards Strategy
> > Office 716-243-2445 / IBM Tieline 320-9138 / Fax 716-243-1778 / Cellular
> > 716-317-6899
> > Text messaging 7163176899@messaging.sprintpcs.com
> > sutor@us.ibm.com  -  http://www.ibm.com/xml
> 
> --
> regards
> tim mcgrath
> TEDIS   fremantle  western australia 6160
> phone: +618 93352228  fax: +618 93352142