Re: TPA and ebXML Header question

[Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM <mwsachs@us.ibm.com>]

Tzvi,

Since the ebXML trading-partners team got started only last month, details
like the one you are questioning have not yet been considered.  Also, the
statement you are pointing to in the IBM tpaML proposal may be obsolete (I
am not sure at this point).  Version 1.0.6 of tpaML defines a separate
response message for exception conditions and a separate action definition
at the other party to process exception response messages.  It may be that
such an indicator is not needed in the header if ebXML retains the
exception response message definition. It depends on whether the Messaging
Service has to be aware that a message is reporting an exception condition
which is to be processed by the business process level.

Regards,
Marty



*************************************************************************************

Martin W. Sachs
IBM T. J. Watson Research Center
P. O. B. 704
Yorktown Hts, NY 10598
914-784-7287;  IBM tie line 863-7287
Notes address:  Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM
Internet address:  mwsachs @ us.ibm.com
*************************************************************************************



Zvi Bruckner <zvi.b@sapiens.com> on 09/26/2000 10:34:27 AM

To:   ebxml-transport@lists.ebxml.org
cc:
Subject:  TPA and ebXML Header question



According to a note in the TPA specs (2.9.19.2):
"The framework-level information associated with the message indicates
only success or failure...In addition a field in the standard message
header ... may indicate success or failure"
>From what I could understand the MessgaeType attribute of the
ebXMLHeader with the value of Error means an MS error message. Is there
a way to specify application success/failure in the header ?

Zvi Bruckner
Sapiens Technologies