[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: TPA and ebXML Header question
Krishna Sankar wrote: > I do agree that we should show that complex business collaborations and >processes can be developed using ebXML, during POC. But the primary goal of >the POC is to show the implementations and practicality of ebXML >specifications. The POC cannot and should not go "ahead" of the >specifications. Part of my point in my last message was that some support for complex conversations is already baked into the BP spec. > We all know that any of the participating organizations can develop very >exotic processes independently but can they develop these processes over >published ebXML specifications is the question. I don't think that "real" order acceptance is very exotic. Or order fulfillment. Or Order-Fulfillment-Payment. > My major concern is that the POC looses the momentum as soon as a >conference is over and then picks up about 3-4 weeks before the next >conference ! (After Tokyo, the year end and Christmas will take up time >until, again, we will be 4 weeks away from the next conference ;-0) One of >the things I am looking for is to keep the same POC team and keep on forging >ahead and have Vienna as the end game, with Vancouver as the mid point. We >should table the scenarios as we think of them (kind of a POC portfolio) and >add them to the POC while making sure that we can show traceability to the >ebXML specs. I agree 100%. That's why I am interesting in lightly discussing scenarios for Vancouver now, and putting some of them on the table in Tokyo. > I think we are still on target - in SJ we concentrated on TRP, in Tokyo we >are showing off RegRep and the theme in Vancouver should and would be BP >with complex interrelated business processes.' That works for me, but I would start with simple interrelated business processes. I would like do at least one negotiation scenario, though. > Another idea is to have a demo room (in the ebXML website) where we can >show different processes based on ebXML, that way we are not restricted to >the POC to show the breadth and depth of the ebXML efforts. That sounds like a good idea to me. You are talking about the web site, so it wouldn't detract from the POC efforts for the meetings. Thanks for continuing the conversation, Bob Haugen
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC