new DTD and sample cpa and cpp instance docs

[Christopher Ferris <chris.ferris@east.sun.com>]

All,

I have attached the latest draft (which will have to do for now
so we can get the spec drafted) of the DTD for CPP/CPA along with
sample XML cpp and cpa docs.

I used a single DTD so that the reuse of elements across the
two can remain consistent. In checking with the experts, this
is not an uncommon practice (to have a DTD with two or more
possible root elements defined).

The two root elements are:
	CollaborationProtocolProfile
	CollaborationProtocolAgreement

They share about 90% of the same structure and content. This
approach will also assure that the two don't ever get out of
synch.

Note that at present I have left out a place to plug in Dale's
packaging profile. This is because of a discussion I had with
Karsten just a few minutes ago. It DEFINITELY needs a place to
go, but where (in the CPP/CPA) is yet to be determined.

Apparently, the BP team added something only recently which deals
with payload composition. I think that there may be some synergy 
to be had between the BPM and Dale's packaging which I think should 
be explored before we add the packaging bits into the DTD.

Since I haven't seen the BPM changes, can we get a discussion
started around this?

Thanks!

Chris

cpa,v0.22.xml

cpp,v0.22.xml

cppml,v0.22.dtd