Re: comment on TA specification

[Martin W Sachs <mwsachs@us.ibm.com>]

Joaquin,

This is much better both because it says "Party instead of Trading Partner"
and especially because you are pointing out that the noun must be singular
since it is a single Party that creates and owns a  CPP.

Regards,
Marty

*************************************************************************************

Martin W. Sachs
IBM T. J. Watson Research Center
P. O. B. 704
Yorktown Hts, NY 10598
914-784-7287;  IBM tie line 863-7287
Notes address:  Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM
Internet address:  mwsachs @ us.ibm.com
*************************************************************************************



Joaquin Miller <miller@joaquin.net> on 01/18/2001 03:01:50 PM

Please respond to Joaquin Miller <joaquin@acm.org>

To:   duane <duane@xmlglobal.com>
cc:   "Cunningham, Robert" <CunninghamR@MTMC.ARMY.MIL>, Martin W
      Sachs/Watson/IBM@IBMUS, knaujok@home.com, ebxml-tp@lists.ebxml.org,
      ebXML-Architecture List <ebxml-architecture@lists.ebxml.org>
Subject:  Re: comment on TA specification



or: A party may create more than one

At 07:54 AM 1/18/2001 -0800, duane wrote:
How about

"Each Trading Partner SHALL register at least one CPP with an ebXML
 compliant Registry system.  Trading Partners may create more than
 one CPP document in instances where they deem it necessary to meet
 their business needs"

Comments?

Duane

Cordially,

Joaquin

................................................
Joaquin Miller
Chief Architect
Financial Systems Architects

mailto:joaquin@acm.org

San Francisco
phone: +1 (510) 336-2545
fax:   +1 (510) 336-2546
PGP Fingerprint:
CA23 6BCA ACAB 6006 E3C3 0E79 2122 94B4 E5FD 42C3