Re: Explanations about examples of CPP/CPA based on CPP/CPASpecificationV1.0

[Yukinori Saito <y-saito@ecom.or.jp>]

Marty,
Thank you very much for your review and comment.
I will revise explanation document about your comment.
Best Regards,
Yukinori Saito

----- Original Message -----
From: Martin W Sachs <mwsachs@us.ibm.com>
To: Yukinori Saito <y-saito@ecom.or.jp>
Cc: TP-Team <ebxml-tp@lists.ebxml.org>; EDIgr)H.Sugamata
<sugamata@ecom.or.jp>; EDIgr)K.Mizoguchi <mizoguchi@ecom.or.jp>;
EDIgr)K.Wakaizumi <waka@ecom.or.jp>
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2001 11:44 PM
Subject: Re: Explanations about examples of CPP/CPA based on CPP/CPA
SpecificationV1.0


>
> Comments on your attached documents:
>
> CPP explanation:
>
>    CPP is allowed to have as many PartyInfo elements as needed, not just 1
>    or 2.
>
>    Otherwise, the CPP explanation is fine.
>
> CPA explanation:
>
>    This is fine.
>
> Regards,
> Marty
>
>
****************************************************************************
*********
>
> Martin W. Sachs
> IBM T. J. Watson Research Center
> P. O. B. 704
> Yorktown Hts, NY 10598
> 914-784-7287;  IBM tie line 863-7287
> Notes address:  Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM
> Internet address:  mwsachs @ us.ibm.com
>
****************************************************************************
*********
>
>
>
> Yukinori Saito <y-saito@ecom.or.jp> on 05/16/2001 09:44:04 PM
>
> To:   TP-Team <ebxml-tp@lists.ebxml.org>
> cc:   "EDIgr)H.Sugamata" <sugamata@ecom.or.jp>, "EDIgr)K.Mizoguchi"
>       <mizoguchi@ecom.or.jp>, "EDIgr)K.Wakaizumi" <waka@ecom.or.jp>
> Subject:  Explanations about examples of CPP/CPA based on CPP/CPA
>       Specification V1.0
>
>
>
> I made brief explanation documents about examples of CPP/CPA based on
> CPP/CPA Specification V1.0.
> I revised some descriptions of explanation documents that were indicated
in
> Vienna meeting.
> If anyone noticed some comments about these explanation documents, please
> let me know.
>
> Followings are my doubt about CPA example.
> (1)The contents of Service element of both companies are different each
> other.
> One (for buyer) is 'uri:example.com/services/buyerService' and the other
> one
> (for seller) is 'uri:example.com/services/sellerService'.
> Is this possible?
> (2)Communication protocol of company '123456789' (buyer) is HTTP and SMTP.
> Communication protocol of company '987654321' (seller) is HTTP only.
> Is this correct?
>
> Best Regards from Japan,
> Yukinori Saito
> --------------------------------------------------
> Yukinori Saito
> Electronic Commerce Promotion Council of Japan(ECOM)
> E-mail:y-saito@ecom.or.jp
> TEL:+81-3-5500-3642   FAX:+81-3-5500-3660
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>