RE: Last Call on Requirements Document ?

["Rik Drummond" <drummond@onramp.net>]

definitions:

section 1.1 there are some cases which do not require a response pair. even
though to maintain the level of service we will probably need the request
response pair, i don't think we should exclude a message which does not a
response.

section 1.2 will the definitions of a document preclude the use of corba
even though it says binary?


Looks good. Rik

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ebxml-transport@lists.oasis-open.org
[mailto:owner-ebxml-transport@lists.oasis-open.org]On Behalf Of David
Burdett
Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 1999 9:48 PM
To: ebXML Transport (E-mail)
Subject: Last Call on Requirements Document ?


Folks

Discussion of the requirements document has gone quiet. So perhaps we can no
do a "last call" and finalize them. We will need to do this soon anyway if
we want to make our deadline of completing the full review by the next F2F
meeting at the end of January.

So I suggest that we aim to finalize these two documents by December 23rd
and that after that date we can then start writing our evaluations.

IS THIS DATE OK WITH EVERYONE? ... please send an email if it's not.

DOES ANYONE HAVE ANY COMMENTS ON THE REQUIREMENTS? ... again send an email
if there are.

Finally, the current version of the requirements and definitions documents
are attached (note the Definitions document has not changed since the last
one I sent out).

David
 <<ebXML Transport Requirements 2.pdf>>   <<ebXML Transport Definitions
0.pdf>>

Advanced Technology, CommerceOne
1600 Riviera Ave, Suite 200, Walnut Creek, CA 94596, USA
Tel: +1 (925) 941 4422 or +1 (650) 623 2888;
mailto:david.burdett@commerceone.com; Web: http://www.commerceone.com