[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Comments on the Requirements
All, Sorry to be so late in participation but I did manage to have vacation the entire month of December. But getting back in the thick of things, here are some comments I have toward the requirement document. Some comments may be duplicated of if they need further explanation please let me know. These are by far not the only requirements that we may need from the aspect of the Travel Industry point of view. I did notice that the requirements has a “document flavor” in terms of the Internet world so as not to confuse anyone where possible I’ll try and keep our Travel Industry specific terms generic and from a “document” point of view. My comments are as follow: 1. a) in the case of multiple documents that are directly related, a method of sequencing must be possible. (May be a point in 5 2)) 2. e) a distinction must be made between system errors and application errors. For example being unable to fulfill a request due to insufficient data to process or a lack product vs. system down, interrupt condition. 3. 3) envelope needs to allow for routing hops or multiple addresses. Not to be confused with broadcast addressing. 10. 1) Scenarios – Provide an element within the transport packaging envelope that indicates to the receiving front-end device that specific business scenarios and dialogues are possible within this set of message exchanges.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC