Re: Syntax Free Models

[Nikola Stojanovic <nstojano@cjds.com>]

Martin,
It looks to me that your paper addresses many of the areas that TP&R group
is responsible for. I would suggest that reading their docs might help (in
case you'd like to be in sync with what they produce?). Also, you might come
with some valuable comments while comparing the two.
Nikola

----- Original Message -----
From: "Martin Bryan" <mtbryan@sgml.u-net.com>
To: <ebxml-core@lists.oasis-open.org>
Sent: Friday, February 11, 2000 3:14 AM
Subject: Re: Syntax Free Models


> As I mentioned in my messages earlier this week, what I posted last time
was
> only part of a larger exercise. During this week I have been tasked by the
> CEN/ISSS project group on Defining and Managing Semantics and Datatypes
with
> drafting a paper on the Syntax-Neutral Definition of Business Semantics.
> Whilst I have yet to have time to complete it (especially the forms needed
> to record semantics) I think the overall framework is now sufficiently
> outlined to make it worthwhile sending to this group to see if they can
> identify any missing components.Comments on the draft paper, which you can
> find at http://www.sgml.u-net.com/neutral.htm, would be very much
welcomed.
>
> Martin Bryan
> Chair of CEN/ISSS DAMSAD project group
>
>